Ketamine Queen Net Worth: Estimated Range and How to Verify

If you searched "Ketamine Queen net worth," here is the direct answer: the person behind that nickname is Jasveen Sangha, a convicted drug dealer now serving a 15-year federal prison sentence. She is not a social media influencer, entertainer, or entrepreneur. The net worth figures floating around online range from $500,000 to $5 million, but none of them are based on verified financial disclosures, and all of them have to be read against the reality that her assets were subject to federal seizure. Here is everything you need to know, including how credible those numbers actually are.

Who is the "Ketamine Queen"?

Jasveen Sangha is a British-born woman who became the central figure in the federal case surrounding the death of actor Matthew Perry in October 2023. The nickname "Ketamine Queen" did not come from a self-promotional brand or social media handle. According to reporting by The Week, the term originated in a text message sent by co-defendant Erik Fleming, who used it to refer to Sangha in the context of the alleged drug supply operation. Prosecutors and the DEA later adopted the label in official communications, including a DEA administrator's remarks tied to the Matthew Perry case, and it stuck as media shorthand.

AP News reporting and a Forbes profile (August 2024) both confirmed that Sangha allegedly positioned herself as a high-end, celebrity-facing supplier, specifically targeting wealthy and famous clientele. Prosecutors alleged she sold Perry 25 vials of ketamine for $6,000 in cash just four days before his death. She pleaded guilty to distribution charges, including distribution of ketamine resulting in death, and in 2025 received a 15-year federal prison sentence. That sentencing is the current timeline anchor for anything written about her finances after that date.

Why net worth numbers online vary so much

"Net worth" estimates for public figures are almost always just that: estimates. Legitimate wealth tracking sites work from a combination of documented income (contracts, public filings, disclosed earnings), asset ownership records, and industry-standard revenue logic. When none of those inputs exist, sites often reverse-engineer a number from whatever is publicly known. In Sangha's case, that means a few court-reported transaction details get extrapolated into speculative annual income, with no audited balance sheet, no tax returns, no business filings, and no verified asset inventory to ground the math.

There is also a meaningful difference between gross income, net income, and net worth. Gross income is what comes in. Net income subtracts costs. Net worth subtracts liabilities (debts, legal judgments, seized assets) from total assets. Most of the sites publishing Sangha's "net worth" are blending these concepts loosely, which is part of why the numbers differ so widely from one page to the next. This is worth keeping in mind any time you are researching a figure whose wealth context is as unusual as this one.

What the claimed numbers actually say

Three ranges appear most frequently across the sites covering Sangha's finances. GazetteDirect published an estimate of $3 to $5 million as of 2025, describing it as a "murky blend" of illicit profits and seized assets. BiographyWallah placed her net worth at approximately $1 million as of 2024. BiographyKind offered a tighter range of $500,000 to $1 million, attributing the wealth to drug sales and a former nail salon business. IBTimes UK also published a net worth figure in a quick-facts format, though, like the others, it relies on secondary estimates rather than court-verified accounting.

The honest bottom line: a range of roughly $500,000 to $1 million is the more conservative and arguably more defensible estimate, given the known constraints (asset seizure, legal costs, incarceration). The $3 to $5 million figure is possible only if Sangha had substantial untouched assets that were neither seized nor documented by prosecutors, which current reporting does not support.

Where the money reportedly came from

Sangha's alleged income streams were not the kind that appear on a W-2. Based on court records, investigative reporting from AP and Forbes, and the DEA's case documentation, the picture looks like this:

• Ketamine sales: The $6,000-for-25-vials transaction cited in the Perry case gives a per-unit data point, and prosecutors suggested a pattern of similar high-volume sales to wealthy clients, though total revenue was never formally quantified in public documents.
• Alleged celebrity-facing clientele: AP reporting noted that Sangha promoted a high-end positioning and allegedly deleted messages to obscure her customer base, suggesting a deliberate business model rather than casual dealing.
• Nail salon: Multiple biographical profiles reference a legitimate nail salon business as a prior or concurrent income source, though no revenue figures for that business have been publicly disclosed.
• Cash holdings: Prosecutors referenced more than $5,000 in seized cash as part of the plea agreement context, a notably modest figure that does not align with the higher net-worth estimates circulating online.

There are no documented brand deals, social media revenue, OnlyFans income, music royalties, or equity investments in Sangha's public profile. This is a straightforward case where the only traceable income streams are alleged illegal sales and a small legitimate business, which makes the higher net-worth estimates particularly hard to defend.

Costs and constraints that reduce the real number

This is the piece most net-worth aggregators skip, and it matters enormously here. Federal drug convictions routinely come with asset forfeiture provisions. Sangha's plea agreement included not contesting the seizure of property connected to the investigation, meaning whatever physical assets and cash were identified as proceeds of the alleged operation were surrendered. That is not a footnote, it is a direct subtraction from any net worth figure.

Beyond forfeiture, there are federal legal defense costs (which, depending on counsel, can run into six figures or more), any civil liability exposure connected to Perry's family or estate, and the practical reality that she is now incarcerated for 15 years with no income-generating activity. Net worth is a snapshot in time, and the snapshot for Sangha post-sentencing is almost certainly lower than any figure published before her guilty plea. Comparing her situation to, say, Queen Key's net worth illustrates how differently wealth accumulates (and erodes) depending on the source and sustainability of income.

How to verify or update the estimate today

If you want to do your own research rather than rely on aggregator sites, here is a practical checklist of the most useful sources to check:

1. Federal court records (PACER): The U.S. federal case docket for Sangha's criminal matter is publicly searchable through PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records). Plea agreements and sentencing documents sometimes reference specific asset values or forfeiture schedules that aggregator sites miss.
2. DEA official communications: The DEA published remarks tied to the Perry case that are available publicly. These are primary-source documents that establish facts without the editorial spin of secondary coverage.
3. AP News and Forbes reporting: Both outlets published detailed identity and case profiles that are credible starting points for timeline and identity verification before you trust any financial estimate.
4. Property records: If Sangha owned real estate in California or elsewhere, county assessor records are public and searchable. These can add or subtract from net-worth estimates depending on what she owned and whether it was seized.
5. Business registration records: California's Secretary of State business portal allows searches for registered businesses. If the nail salon was formally registered, that record would be public and could clarify ownership and operating history.
6. Cross-reference the sentencing date: Any net-worth figure published before her September 2025 guilty plea or her 15-year sentence may not account for post-plea forfeiture and legal costs. Use the sentencing as your recalibration point when reading older estimates.

Common mix-ups with this search

"Ketamine Queen" is not an exclusively singular phrase, and search results can pull up several different contexts at once. Apple Music lists "Ketamine Queen" as a song title by unrelated artists, meaning someone searching the term might land on music content that has nothing to do with the Perry case or Jasveen Sangha. There are also podcast episodes and cultural commentary pieces using the phrase more loosely. If you are specifically researching Sangha, adding her full name to any search will filter out the unrelated creative works.

A separate confusion pattern involves ketamine as a medical topic. Ketamine is a legitimate FDA-approved anesthetic also used in clinical settings for treatment-resistant depression. Reddit discussions and social media threads sometimes conflate coverage of the Sangha case with debates about ketamine therapy, which are entirely unrelated conversations. The nickname in the Perry case is tied to alleged illegal distribution, not to the medical or therapeutic use of the drug.

There is also occasional confusion with other public figures whose names or nicknames include "queen" or similar terms. Readers researching adjacent figures in music and entertainment might find it useful to look at profiles like Elle King's net worth or Queen Kwong's net worth if their original search was actually aimed at a female artist rather than the Perry case figure. Similarly, Queenlock's net worth and Queenlock1989's net worth are searches that sometimes surface alongside "Ketamine Queen" queries in auto-complete, which can misdirect readers who were never looking for the drug case in the first place.

On the entertainment side, Queen Kalin's net worth is another figure whose name shows up in "queen" adjacent searches, as does Maharani Kemala's net worth in searches touching royalty-themed or "queen" branding. The 2022 film covered in The Woman King net worth discussions is yet another search-result neighbor that shares thematic framing without any connection to Sangha. Knowing these disambiguation points will save you time if you end up on the wrong page.

What the evidence actually supports

Based on everything publicly available as of April 2026, the most defensible estimate for Jasveen Sangha's pre-conviction net worth sits in the $500,000 to $1 million range. The $3 to $5 million figure requires assumptions about untouched hidden assets that are not supported by the court record or seized-cash disclosures. Post-sentencing, with asset forfeiture and legal costs factored in, the realistic current figure is almost certainly lower than any pre-arrest estimate.

If you want to stay current on any new financial disclosures, the best approach is to set a Google Alert for "Jasveen Sangha" and check PACER for any civil proceedings that might surface additional asset details. Court-connected financial information is the only category of data that would meaningfully change the picture here, since there are no business ventures, investment portfolios, or public income streams to track.